The feedback provided could prove to be a more effective method of teaching people how to touch-type. Leveraging hand tracking technology, it is possible to identify if a user is touch-typing or not, providing a method to give feedback to people learning how to touch-type. It would be impossible for a human to consistently detect finger-key associations over long periods of time. In order to provide this type of feedback on touch-typing a method to track finger key associations needs to be in place. ![]() What the current feedback does not provide the user is the fingers used to press the keys, one of the areas in which the most mistakes may be made. The positive influence that feedback has on typing proficiency has been proven multiple times on multiple devices. The websites or stand-alone software identify which keys are pressed and the time taken to do so thus giving feedback to the users in order to improve their performance. Touch-typing is conventionally learned via websites that teach touch-typing concepts and finger mappings. This makes touch typing beneficial in note taking, programming, live communication and many other aspects of computer use. This means typists can designate more focus to interacting with the screen and therefore inadvertently increasing their typing speed in the process. Touch-typing involves more than simply increasing typing speed, in that it enables typists to split the cognitive processing by offloading information from the visual channel. I just want to know your thoughts on why these seemingly suboptimal placements (particularly "c", "b", "0", and "6") are 'recommended'.Touch-typing is a psychomotor skill involving combining a users’ cognitive functions with physical movement. ![]() Of course I understand that you can (and many do) have unique styles of typing with equal or better speeds than 'traditional' touch typists.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |